Monday, May 26, 2014

On November 26, 2012 "Archangel" Ira Robins submitted this Affidavit with1100 pages of supporting documents and 9 DVDs of evidence to the FBI and US Attorney for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Recently additional information and potential witnesses have been identified and the relative information was submitted as additional evidence.  Based upon recent information it is believed that an active investigation is in progress.
---------------------------------  
Ira B. Robins     
Investigative Consultant
Post Office Box 302                                        
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201
414-305-8832
irarobins@gmail.com


Teresa L. Carlson
Special Agent in Charge
Federal Bureau of Investigation
330 East Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 600
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202

Mr. James L. Santelle
U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District
517 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 530
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202

November 26, 2012

Subject:  Request for investigation into criminal constitutional rights violations by City of Kenosha law enforcement officers.

Dear Agent Carlson and U.S. Attorney Santelle:

            I respectfully request an investigation into the Michael Edward Bell homicide on November 9, 2004, by Officer Albert B. Gonzales of the Kenosha, Wisconsin Police Department.  Please include in your investigation the ensuing and continuing conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and all civil rights violations concerning his death.  These crimes were committed by several officers, their supervisors, and Chiefs of Police John Morrissey and Daniel Wade all acting under the color of state law.  You will find overwhelming evidence to support my allegations in the attached Affidavit.
 
An investigation into the pattern and practice of perjury, falsified police reports, concealment of evidence, and acts of dishonesty that are the result of institutional dishonesty at the Kenosha Police Department is also requested.  This institutional misconduct substantiates the police behavior that has resulted in the denial of the civil rights of Michael Edward Bell and the citizens of Kenosha, Wisconsin.

            The enclosed submission contains the following sections:

            Section Number one is my Affidavit containing evidence of the criminal conduct surrounding the Michael Edward Bell homicide.

            Section Number two is the Affidavit of Attorney Denise Hertz-McGrath who practices the majority of her work in Kenosha County and provides additional evidence to support the claim of institutional dishonesty.

            Section Number three is the Affidavit of (Ret.) Detective Russell R. Beckman of Kenosha, Wisconsin, citing specific cases and providing substantial proof of many acts of police misconduct.

On November 9, 2004, a Kenosha, Wisconsin, police officer shot and killed Michael Edward Bell in the driveway of his residence.  The original official police reports of the four police officers claimed that a lieutenant had been physically holding Mr. Bell in a bear hug, slightly bent forward at the hip, over the hood of the driver’s side of the car. These reports stated that Bell had been shot with a semi-automatic handgun placed directly against the left side of his head by an officer who had been standing in front of that vehicle.  Those reports were false.  Michael Edward Bell had actually been shot in the right side of his head.
 
The four police officers maintained this story until after they all testified in depositions relating to a civil case brought by the Bell family. It was at this time that they learned from the Bell family’s attorneys that the autopsy report of the medical examiner showed that Bell had actually been shot in the right side of the head. 

Subsequently, the police officers involved created a second version and participated in a video-taped reenactment purporting to show how Michael Edward Bell was twisting his body at the time that he was shot.  In their new version, the lieutenant still claimed that he was standing behind Mr. Bell when the shot was fired but he added that Mr. Bell was twisting and turning at the time.  There was no mention in either the police reports or the lieutenant’s deposition that Mr. Bell had been twisting or turning.   This new reenactment shows that the lieutenant would have been directly behind Mr. Bell and in the line of fire, but there was no blood on his uniform nor was he struck by the bullet after it passed through Mr. Bell’s head as would have been expected. 

The police officers involved then created a third version and video reenactment in which they claimed more new facts that were also contrary to the forensic evidence and the medical examiner’s report.  The contact wound on Michael Edward Bell’s head did not match the new story, and the bullet casing that had been ejected from the gun was found in a location opposite to where its trajectory should have taken it. Additionally, eyewitnesses reported that the officer who did the shooting was not where the other officers claimed he had been at the time he fired the fatal shot.  One witness reported hearing a male voice yell immediately after the shot was fired, “What did you do that for? That wasn’t necessary!  Get someone here right now!” (All of the citizen witnesses reported being at the scene at that moment, besides the four police officers, were female.)

The officer who had fired the shot claimed in a fourth version that he had held his gun sideways, “gangster style,” and that was why the casing was found where it was.  That statement was contrary to the forensic evidence and the reports and affidavits of the medical examiner. It is absolutely contrary to what the officer had testified to under oath in his deposition.

The aforementioned facts of rehearsed collaboration constitute Conspiracy, Obstruction of Justice, and the Violation of Civil Rights (Criminal) and are supported by the official reports of the Kenosha Police Department, the sworn affidavits and testimony of the officers, statements of citizen witnesses, and the reports and affidavits of the medical examiner. 

Based upon the falsified information provided by the police officers, it is not known, and will never be known without a proper investigation, if the shooting of Michael Edward Bell was an overzealous reaction by a police officer, a tragic mistake covered up by the officers, or, in fact, a deliberate murder. 

Within 48 hours after the incident, the Kenosha Police Department declared the death of Michael Edward Bell a “good” shooting.  The Kenosha County District Attorney, based his defective decision on the falsified information provided by the four officers and ruled the death of Michael Edward Bell “justifiable.”
 
Kenosha’s expert witnesses provided “illegitimate” opinions based on the falsified information provided by the officers concluding that the police actions were reasonable. 

The evidence shows conclusively that the officers committed a number of federal crimes in their attempts to cover up what actually happened the night Michael Edward Bell was killed. 

I submit herewith my sworn Affidavit supported by numerous exhibits which serve as the factual basis of my request for an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Attorney.

I also attach the sworn Affidavit of an attorney who presently practices law in Kenosha County.  This Affidavit contains specific instances, including a video recording of continuing police misconduct and a pattern and practice of lies, perjury, and the withholding of exculpatory evidence that constitute violations of federal crimes committed under  color of state law.  This attorney first reported the misconduct to the United States Attorney’s office more than two years ago.

Lastly, I attach the sworn Affidavit of a retired Kenosha police detective that details specific evidence of police misconduct as well as proof of a pattern and practice of perjury, and withholding exculpatory evidence.  These actions reflect numerous federal crimes committed under the color of law.  The information and evidence of criminal conduct provided by the retired detective relates to some of the same detectives, supervisors, and officers who investigated the death of Michael Edward Bell and participated in the cover-up.

All documents, transcripts, photography, and records not attached in this document are available to you in their entirety and will be immediately provided upon request.

Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.
Sincerely,


Ira B. Robins
IBR/kal/smb

QUESTIONS: Does anyone know what the federal government is doing about this criminal conduct?  Why do the FBI and US Attorney keep everything a secret?  What is taking them so long to conduct this investigation?  Don't they know that the Kenosha Police, District Attorney, City Attorney, Police and Fire Commission, and others have been hiding and destroying evidence? That they are knowingly obstructing justice?  What in the hell do you have to do to get them to move off dead center?    

Thursday, May 22, 2014

"Archangels" sent this letter to Governor Scott with a copy to SA Aronberg!

Archangels of Justice
                                                                                                                                               
                                                               
May 22, 2014
Governor Rick Scott
State of Florida
The Capitol
400 S. Monroe Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001

Dear Governor Scott,

On December 29, 2013, we sent you a letter requesting an “…immediate investigation into the alleged criminal conduct of Lieutenant (now Captain) Michael Ewing and the ensuing cover-up by officials of the Martin County Sheriff’s Office and others.”

In late April, 2014, we accidently learned that pursuant to our request for a change in prosecutor you assigned Palm Beach County State Attorney David A. Aronberg. That was to review and prosecute the matter “…to avoid a conflict of interest or any appearance of impropriety…” similar to the conflict regarding State Attorney Bruce Colton.  Mr. Colton is a friend of MCSO Sheriff Snyder who should be considered a main suspect in the matter.  One day after we published your change of State Attorney his investigators began to contact our witnesses.  How convenient.

We immediately informed you of the connections between Mr. Aronberg and Sheriff Snyder and requested still another prosecutor be assigned in the interest of honesty and integrity but to date Aronberg continues to remain on the case.  That in itself appears to be another conflict of interest and gives an appearance or stink if you will of impropriety. Why would you put Aronberg in the position of receiving a professional complaint and why would you open him and yourself up to more public criticism? Is maintaining the cover-up worth it?  While your cronies will probably do nothing to you or Aronberg for the conflict of interest or cover-up the voters will have the final say.  We believe that assigning a new State Attorney, with no connection to the parties involved, is necessary to preserve the integrity of the State of Florida.  Please do so immediately.
Thank you very much.

Salvatore E. Rastrelli                                                                 Ira B. Robins
Cc: David A. Aronberg

3110 South East Slater Street
772-215-1162
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

QUESTIONS: Why would Aronberg want to expose himself to a professional complaint?  Does he know that the process against attorneys is rigged?  That nothing will happen to him for an obvious conflict of interest?  What about the Governor?  Is he willing to sacrifice Aronberg's reputation for his own personal gain?  Or expose himself to unnecessary criticism?  Let the voters decide!


Friday, May 9, 2014

FOR YOUR READING PLEASURE:  "Archangels" just delivered this letter to the Martin County Florida Board of Commissioners. Enjoy!


































QUESTIONS: Do you think that Sheriff Snyder needs a little oversight here?  Didn't he run for office on a fiscal responsibility ticket?  Do you still believe him?   Do you think that the Martin County Board will do the right thing or continue to sit on their thumbs?  Stay tuned!

Thursday, May 8, 2014

HOW IRRESPONSIBLE CAN THE DIVISION OF CHILD & FAMILIES BE?







































QUESTIONS:  What kind of people are these?  Who do they think they are?  Do you see how they have failed to protect the hundreds of dead children who were under their charge?  Shouldn't Governor Scott know that the agency needs a house cleaning from top to bottom?  Doesn't he know that his job depends on him doing the right thing?  Why should we pay these pathetic good ole boys?  

Thursday, May 1, 2014

This Letter Is A Followup To Our 4-26-2014 Posting.

This is evidence of the State Attorney's continuing attempt to coverup the truth and protect one of the "good ole boys." 




































QUESTIONS: Why do they call state attorneys and judges "honorable"?  Don't they realize that there is no honor among thieves?  Don't they know when you expose their activities, or lack thereof, to the light of day they face being unelected in the next election?  Or that they may have to work at a job where they may have to do something for their pay?  More to come. Stay tuned!